<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Reiznersway Investment Articles</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles/1</id>
   <updated>2008-07-28T22:45:07Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Articles providing investment advice and insight by John Reizner</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.34</generator>

<entry>
   <title>The Obama Factor: Why His &quot;Change&quot; May Make You Economically Worse Off</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/07/the_obama_factor_why_his_chang.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.22</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-28T22:13:06Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-28T22:45:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article Americans are known for voting according to the health of their pocketbooks, and this year’s election may be no exception. While Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980 emerged out of the very noticeable dissatisfaction with...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Obama%20Factor%20Why%20His%20Change%20May%20Make%20You%20Economically%20Worse%20Off.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

Americans are known for voting according to the health of their pocketbooks, and this year’s election may be no exception. While Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980 emerged out of the very noticeable dissatisfaction with the economic policies of the Carter years, Senator Obama may capitalize on similar sentiment among voters today in the race for the Presidency.
]]>
      Reagan asked the voters if they felt that they were better off than when Jimmy Carter was elected. The voters ushered in Reagan to the White House as voters answered that question for themselves. The misery index, a measure of consumer discomfort based on the high inflation and high unemployment of the Carter years made Reagan’s election more likely.
Senator’s Obama rapid rise to become a popular candidate for the Presidency may be attributable to the current level of dissatisfaction with the economy: the level of high inflation, mortgage defaults, bank failures, a faltering stock market, and the feeling among the citizenry that they are not better off than they were four years ago. Senator Obama has been saying that America needs change, though he has stated that he is going to tell Americans not what they want to hear, but what they need to hear. I think Americans hunger for something, though I am not sure that many are bargaining for the changes that Senator Obama might effect.

I would argue that while the Reagan years ushered in an era of relative economic stability, dramatically lower inflation and unemployment, and a stock market boom, the Obama years may result in a contracting, less globally competitive (competitiveness is a must in today’s globalized world), less flexible economy, higher inflation and unemployment, a declining or range-bound stock market, and waiting lists for such essential health services as non-elective surgery. The consumer may feel more pain, not less under Obama.

Inflation results in the debasement of the currency. When prices rise, it takes more dollars to buy goods and services. The current high oil price and easy monetary policy have resulted in price inflation across many sectors of the economy and may auger in greater inflation in the future as the level of inflationary expectations continues to rise. Obama may face this threat to economic health from day one if he is elected, as people are conditioned to expect greater inflation, and may act accordingly.  Inflation has a distorting effect on the economy, and consumers may feel more pain under Obama if the price level of goods and services increases more rapidly.

Obama’s proposed economic policies of greater trade protectionism (free trade tends to moderate the level of inflation), budget-busting government spending, tax increases, and policies favoring higher cost, less flexible unionized labor may do little to curtail inflation, and may actually add to the problem. I believe that it is important to put the inflation genie back into the bottle at this time as the rate of change of the inflation level appears to be accelerating. Obama’s budget-busting policies may not accomplish this end.
 
As readers of this article blog know, I have been making the case for a year and a half that we may be experiencing, and may continue to experience a worsening inflation rate similar to the 1970’s period that caused so many economic problems. What was needed then, as inflation surged into double digits, was a tighter Federal Reserve monetary policy. This contained inflation for two decades commencing in the early 1980’s as Paul Volker’s Federal Reserve clamped down on the economy, the latter which endured a terrible recession at that time. 

Containing inflation is really a balancing act, as an overly zealous Federal Reserve and poor government economic policy choices can result in an economic depression, as happened in the 1930’s, and which some feared a repeat of after the millennium stock bear market commenced. Current Fed Chairman Bernanke seems to be playing with fire as he vigorously eases (for now) monetary policies to stave off recession and the effects of the housing crisis. 

I must write a moment about the potential future of our healthcare system under an Obama administration. His stated goal of reducing the cost of everyone’s health insurance policies by $2,500 may not really reduce by much the cost of healthcare, as many existing insurance policies may be unprofitable for the insurance companies to continue to offer in their existing forms to new clients. 

Uninsured individuals entering the insurance market for the first time may receive less expansive coverage reflecting the reduced premium levels to the insuring companies. Some insurance companies that rely on healthcare premiums for their entire business may fall into financial distress as their lines at the reduced mandated premiums may not cover costs. Thus the burden of insuring many citizens may fall into the government’s hands, which may cost the American taxpayer more, not less. Even if government picks up the slack and there are more insured, expect waiting lists for life-saving surgeries as a more heavily regulated health system struggles to keep pace with demand.

I do not believe that Obama’s vision for the economy will produce enlightened government policies that will protect the value of the dollar, contain inflation, keep us globally competitive and maintain the quality and rapid accessibility of our healthcare. Rather it appears that many of the ideas of the Obama campaign are drawn from the economic and political ash heap of history: the utopian concept of equality between the haves and the have-nots, or a society that redistributes wealth from its producers to others who are not as productive, is an idea that was hated by the citizens who lived under such “utopias” and whose end was celebrated when the regimes that embraced such ideas collapsed.

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>How Obama May Bomb the Stock Market and the Economy in 2009-2010</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/06/how_obama_may_bomb_the_stock_m.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.21</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-20T06:16:00Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-23T17:04:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article I would like to draw your attention to the following web page graph denoting the Presidential futures market vote shares between Democratic and Republican candidates in the upcoming 2008 Presidential Election (as expressed in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/How%20Obama%20May%20Bomb%20the%20Stock%20Market%20and%20the%20Economy%20in%202009-2010.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

I would like to draw your attention to the following web page graph denoting the Presidential futures market vote shares between Democratic and Republican candidates in the upcoming 2008 Presidential Election (as expressed in the Iowa Electronic Markets – a respected election futures market): 
<a href="http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/graphs/graph_Pres08_VS.cfm">http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/graphs/graph_Pres08_VS.cfm</a>.

This shows a potential Obama victory in the Presidential election, as the Iowa Electronics Markets has a good record at predicting election outcomes.
]]>
      <![CDATA[I believe a potential Obama Presidency, given many of the policies that have been proposed by the Obama camp and by others in the Democratic Party, may hinder the economy’s flexibility, competitiveness, and productivity – strengths that may explain why the American economy has been able to withstand many past economic shocks without fundamentally faltering. Notably, Alan Greenspan observed in a past speech that the flexibility of our economy was related to having less economic regulation of industry. 

Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of the new supplanting the old, or “creative destruction,” is meaningful here.  For example, it might not be a good idea in many cases for an Obama administration to “bail out” failing companies as these companies may produce obsolete products, use outmoded manufacturing techniques, or just be globally non-competitive (no one wants to buy their products). If our government does not bail out failing companies, then risk takers will have the opportunity to establish companies that use new technology or that produce products in high demand. Also, it may be better to have workers from older industries retrained for the emerging jobs of up and coming companies. 

Further, higher taxes on risk takers, taking money from one group of wealth producers and giving it to another less productive group (the redistribution of wealth, sometimes embraced in left-wing countries), and the proposed gutting of free trade (the renegotiation of the NAFTA), may lower the level of confidence in the American economy here and abroad. Capital outflow from the United States from the investor class could begin in earnest. It is even possible down the road that Obama could be convinced, because of the outflow of capital from the US, to place capital controls on the movement of money, a move that might be a body blow to our stock market and the dollar. It is also conceivable that a run on the dollar could propel an Obama administration to place restrictions on US citizens on the flow of their money.

I have written about the importance of the level of confidence behind the scenes in the economy and the markets in my article, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/10/the_level_of_confidence_in_the.html">The Level of Confidence in Our Stock Market and Our Social Contract</a>, posted on my website on October 1, 2007. Without confidence, there is nothing to hold the stock market up. An example of this was in the aftermath of the October 1929 stock market collapse, when poor policy choices caused much suffering among the public and businesses (the Federal Reserve shrinking the money supply, tax increases, the Smoot-Hawley trade tariffs of 1930, and the wholesale liquation of debt). A loss of confidence in the stock market and the economy ensued and persisted for years. Should Obama win in late 2008, and should he make poor policy choices, the stock market may proceed into a 1970’s style decline. As a result of this potential destruction of wealth, investors and the economy may be in for real difficulty.

I have been writing about the 1970’s style inflation in our economy on my <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/index.html">website</a> article blog for over a year. We already have an embedded inflationary economy which I believe may worsen over the next few years. Also, recent Federal Reserve easing to combat the credit crunch / subprime crisis may likely filter through the economy, perhaps lifting inflation dramatically. I also believe that as this inflation takes further hold, interest rates may climb.

A rejuvenation of the unenlightened policies of the 1970’s and even from the 1930’s may cause a contraction in the price earnings ratio of many stocks (many stock prices may decline) in the market as well as a continuation of a higher inflation economy. I first wrote about this contraction of P/E ratios in my January 18, 2008 article, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/01/the_stock_market_and_economy_a.html">The Stock Market and Economy: A Return to the 1970's in Form?</a>. We have already witnessed a 15% decline in the stock market.

Some sectors of the stock market may resist the decline of equity prices. I plan to hold onto my oil, oil service, and railroad stocks, along with certain industrials and my gold position. The oil companies may be hit by a windfall profits tax, which may result in less oil being produced. Excess regulation in this area and the railroad sector would be a cautionary factor for these stocks. I also have some large cap growth companies which are already doing well: Anheuser Busch, Wal-Mart, and Johnson & Johnson (all Warren Buffett holdings). I will maintain these. I also continue to hold a position in the Templeton Global Bond Fund.

If the general market turns down, most stocks, even the best groups, may move downward. However, I believe the resource and materials (inflation-hedge) stocks along with the price of gold may recover and surmount their highs as inflation may be hard to contain. With the higher inflation I foresee, the economy may in time need to be stifled by high interest rates and tight money to cure the inflation disease–just as Paul Volker’s Federal Reserve in the early 1980’s put a monetary stranglehold on the economy after the high inflation of the 1970’s.

I am going to continue to watch the Iowa Electronic Markets for clues about the election outcome. As far as my remaining stock portfolio, I am going to look at stocks to sell that may be badly bruised by an Obama market. Perhaps cash will continue to be king for now as we proceed through the unwinding of this credit crunch and the beginning of a possible ultra-liberal administration.  
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Call to the Bernanke Federal Reserve: Round up the Debt!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/05/call_to_the_bernanke_federal_r.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.20</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-14T22:26:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-09T01:05:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article Sir John Templeton’s sentiment that never before in U.S. history has our government and its citizens accumulated the level of financial debt as we have recently was referenced in my February 28th, 2007 article....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="25" label="debt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="27" label="subprime mortgage crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Call%20to%20the%20Federal%20Reserve%20Round%20Up%20the%20Debt.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

Sir John Templeton’s sentiment that never before in U.S. history has our government and its citizens accumulated the level of financial debt as we have recently was referenced in my <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/02/hedge_funds_derivatives_debt_c.html">February 28th, 2007 article</a>.  And it is the citizenry who usually suffers from the eventual debt reckoning, forcing a decline in their living standards, Templeton believes. 

The last great debt liquidation in the United States happened as the 1930’s Depression unfolded. After the stock market Crash of October 1929, the fledgling Federal Reserve shrank the money supply by a third, presumably to fight inflation, only exasperating the severe economic downturn of the 1930’s. ]]>
      <![CDATA[The Federal Reserve in 2008 under the weight of the public budget deficit and profligate government spending is once again desperately trying to prevent or postpone a final reckoning of both our country’s public debt and our citizens’ privately held debt. The public debt is well known and has been advertised by many commentators and financial writers for years. It seems to have a life of its own, mostly growing from economic cycle to cycle, except for a short period of a balanced Federal budget during the Clinton years. The Federal Reserve, through its current interest rate easing as a response to the subprime debt crisis (though that easing might be reversed in the future to fight inflation), may succeed in inflating away part of that massive Federal budget deficit.  The problem is that as the level of public and private debt has increased through several economic cycles without a cleansing of the system, it has become more difficult through each economic downturn for the Fed to get the economy going again through its usual monetary activities. Note that Alan Greenspan had to lower key interest rates to 1% after the stock market bubble burst in 2000 before the economy and the stock market recovered. 

Today, the Federal Reserve under Chairman Bernanke has attempted to stem an economic bankruptcy contagion with the Bear Stearns bailout. This is at the cost of a massive Federal Reserve easing, which I believe may exasperate the inflation that we are now experiencing down the road. We may have barely entered recession and already the Federal Reserve is giving the economy full courses of antibiotics. Allowing the business cycle to complete takes out the excesses and bubbles in the system – the Fed may be today attempting to repeal the business cycle by avoiding the slightest whisper of recession.

The subprime debt crisis, partially caused by fraudulent and/or overly aggressive lending practices, has caused many people to lose their homes because of their high debt levels.  Some perhaps should not have qualified for their loans in the first place. The Federal government now is offering assistance to creditworthy individuals whose mortgage payments may be escalating due to the terms of their mortgages. As bad as the credit and real estate crunch may seem, there may be responsible new buyers out there who would qualify for and deserve good home loans. 

On the investment front, there are some very savvy investors, Warren Buffett among them, who have been diversifying their portfolio or their company’s portfolio to include non-U.S. companies. The dollar in late 2007-2008 declined through a two decade shelf of chart support and (except for short to medium term upward countertrends) may trade lower long term. Adding to the mix, we may find with the possibility of a Democratic Party triple-sweep later this election year, policies enacted that may hinder the stock market’s progress in a manner not seen since the late 1970’s. I discussed this possibility and its consequences in this <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/12/the_hillary_clinton_stock_mark.html">article</a>. However, it may be that certain inflation sensitive investments do well over the longer term.

I own shares of the Templeton Global Bond Fund to take further advantage of the potential of a declining dollar. Gold is also a beneficiary of a declining dollar over the long term, and has even made upward progress during the last few years when the dollar has been intermittently strong. Gold can also be a hedge against a debt crisis such as we have seen with the subprime contagion, though the recent March 2008 high in gold was marked by the Federal Reserve bailout of Bear Stearns, which has hopefully stemmed the tide of the current crisis. I have owned gold over the last several years and plan to continue holding the yellow metal.

The Federal Reserve’s job is to fight inflation. As Chairman Bernanke is a student of the 1930’s Great Depression when the economic system failed, he seems determined to prevent a similar economic catastrophe from happening again. Thus, recently we have seen easy money policies implemented designed to stimulate the economy and the housing market, where the hurt is greatest. Preventing a debt implosion whereby the financial system collapses seems to be on the Fed’s priority list. That the Federal Reserve has taken such steps in the face of a current inflation indicates that the possibility of such a collapse has been seen as a possible reality.

About the Author
John Reizner was first exposed to financial markets when he started reading the stock quotes out of the newspaper to his businessman grandfather, who was legally blind, when he was about ten. Papa always told him: "Buy Triple A" (the best stocks). Later, John studied economics at both Vassar College and Columbia University, where he became intrigued by the link between psychology and economic theory. His current book, A Way to Wealth – the Art of Investing in Common Stocks, is available at his website, http://www.ReiznersWay.com. ]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Strategies for the Coming Inflation of 2009-2010</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/04/strategies_for_the_coming_infl.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.19</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-01T23:27:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-01T23:47:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article The inflation that I believe may throttle though our economy in the late 2008-2010 period may not be the first inflationary economy many of us have ever seen. There is widespread commentary these days...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/How%20to%20Survive%20and%20Prosper_Strategies%20for%20the%20Coming%20Inflation.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

The inflation that I believe may throttle though our economy in the late 2008-2010 period may not be the first inflationary economy many of us have ever seen. There is widespread commentary these days about the similarities between the stagflation/inflation that transpired in the 1970’s, and what may be starting to happen in that manner in 2008 and going forward. There are the behavioral similarities between the 1970’s and now: a rising gold price, increasing oil prices, an increase in the rate of inflation in certain commodities such as food, milk, farmland, copper, and a declining dollar (concurrent with a rise in the value of harder money currencies such as the Euro and the Swiss Franc).]]>
      <![CDATA[I wrote most recently in my article: <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/01/the_stock_market_and_economy_a.html">The Stock Market and Economy: A Return to the 1970's in Form</a>, that I foresaw for the present: a temporary cresting of the prices of inflation hedges such as gold and oil. In the case of gold, the price has shot recently through its old 1980 high of $850 per ounce like a knife through soft butter, to as high as $1,023.50 on March 17, 2008, causing me to believe even more strongly that the long term outlook is good for the yellow metal, though as I said, there may be a pause or even an intermediate consolidation/downtrend, before it may resume its powerful rise. I believe that this is so, as even the intense rise in the price of gold in the 1970’s was interrupted by a sharp mid-course correction in mid-decade. 

I came into my initial age of investing during the late 1970’s inflation when there was a dynamically rising gold price, rising interest rates, and high unemployment. The depth of the recessions this country experienced in the 1970’s and early 1980’s dwarfs those that we have experienced since then, including the banking/real estate collapse of the early 1990’s. 
Anecdotally, there were numerous popular newsletters and books at the time of the 1970’s inflation predicting a permanent upward price spiral that would hobble the economy. Many writers in that last inflation were actually advocating converting one’s money into gold, diamonds, rare coins, and stocking up on canned goods. Some newsletter writers were preaching to their readers regarding how to protect one’s family should the U.S. economy collapse. 

That this collapse did not pan out is a credit to the tight money Federal Reserve led by Paul Volker, who probably saved this country from a distinct possibility of hyperinflation into the 1980’s. This proved that it is possible to stop inflation in a financial system based on paper money if the will of the Federal Reserve is strong enough. Volker’s actions laid the groundwork for twenty-five years of relative price stability. Yet today our Federal Reserve under Chairman Bernanke is doing something altogether different – stoking inflation through powerful monetary easing – while at the same time inflation is percolating in areas of the economy.

What are the markets telling us now in 2008 that so many commentators are beginning to make analogies from current trends to the 1970’s? I personally have been invested in Canadian Maple Leafs and gold bullion for several years, and have offered positive commentary on gold during much of the last year on my <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/index.html">website</a> article blog. I believe that the rising gold price reflects not only increasing consumer inflation today as in the 1970’s, but is anticipating a potential Democratic Presidential victory in the fall, where policies hostile to the stock market and economic growth not seen since the 1970’s could be implemented – a poor omen for the economy and a harbinger of greater inflation. Please see my article, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/12/the_hillary_clinton_stock_mark.html">The Hillary Clinton Stock Market and Economy: Three Areas to Consider.</a>  Ken Heebner, a veteran fund manager whose opinions I have mentioned in my article blog in the past, was reported to say that he expects for the next few years a stock market showing out performance by inflationary hedges similar to 1976-1980. I would agree with this sentiment, reinforcing Heebner’s view that money may be made with inflationary hedges such as gold and oil.  
 
Some of the advice the doomsday writers of the 1970’s handed out might actually be worth taking now. Stocking up on goods before the price of those goods goes up seems a sensible strategy. I recently visited Nordstrom where I saw my Italian Napa leather shoes (the only kind of leather my feet will tolerate) on sale for $460 a pair, $60 a pair dearer than over a year and a half ago when I first bought them. Those extra $50’s add up quickly! And owning gold which I believe will likely be worth more in a few years than the recent price of $879, appears to be a sound all-weather investment. Gold can be both an inflation and a deflation hedge (gold shares did well during part of the deflationary 1930’s), which may explain why it is rising at the same time as the declining housing market. 

Assuming the entire system does not buckle, and I do not think it will, I am also thinking of dipping a toe into the water and buying one or two banks not affected badly by the subprime effect, but whose price went down in sympathy with affected banks. Warren Buffett has bought shares of US Bancorp, a high yielder. 
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Stock Prices and the End of Disinflation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/02/stock_prices_and_the_end_of_di.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.18</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-29T23:22:49Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-29T23:49:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article The disinflation we have experienced in our economy from 1982-2007 (until what I call the silent inflation of the last couple years turned into a more evident broader inflation in recent months) has been...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Stock%20Prices%20and%20the%20end%20of%20Disinflation.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

The disinflation we have experienced in our economy from 1982-2007 (until what I call the silent inflation of the last couple years turned into a more evident broader inflation in recent months) has been in my opinion one of the major underpinnings of the long term bull market in equities during much of the former period. This time was punctuated by the 1987 crash and the 2000-2003 post bubble era bear market.  In addition, the lower regulation and non interference with the economy ushered in by the Reagan administration over two decades ago created an atmosphere conducive to investing in stocks and bonds – not to mention Paul Volker of the Federal Reserve Board being determined to successfully break the back of the 1970’s embedded inflation.
]]>
      <![CDATA[In contrast to the buoyant 1980’s – 1990’s, stocks went nowhere between the 1966 beginnings of Vietnam war era inflation through the 1970’s until 1982, sixteen long years later, when the Dow Industrial average finally pierced through its old 1966 high. Economic policies such as excessive regulation, artificial wage and price controls, and poor general economic conditions were anathema during the 70’s to stock and bond investments. For example, many long term bonds my family held back then (bonds were usually thought to be a safe haven for investments), lost almost half their value as interest rates soared skyward into double digits in the late 70’s.. 

We have experienced after the post 2000 bubble bear market, a bull market in equities starting in 2003, a multiyear ascent in the share prices of oil and oil service firms and more than a doubling of the gold price. No one seemed to notice until recently that the gold price, oil price and oil service share price increases are to a strong degree the same behaviors experienced during the 1970’s, the last heyday of economic inflation. If you have been invested in these inflation hedges in the last few years, you likely have benefited from a reflation of asset hedge prices. I have been pointing to those similarities between the 70’s and recent times for over a year on my website article blog.

Oil prices recently exceeded a level approximately equal to the inflation/adjusted high achieved during that last heyday – many commentators and pundits today are only now sounding warnings that the enemy of the stock market, inflation, is rearing its ugly head for the first time in recent memory. There seems to be today less sensitivity to inflation than three decades ago (those whose mortgages are not subprime and who bought their homes earlier still may have booked housing price gains – they may have extra dollars to absorb price increases of goods and services). There is also little current reflection on how inflation in the past has affected stocks and bonds which has allowed this stock market to propel upward until recently in the manner of a false illusion. Remember, increased inflation pushes up interest rates, which in turn puts pressure on paper assets such as stocks and bonds. That the Federal Reserve is now lowering rates vigorously in the face of the subprime and credit crisis may jolt the stock market upward until the resulting greater inflation may take hold down the road.

Politicians recently have also spoken of dramatically increasing the taxes on private equity deals and capital gains – which, if enacted, would pull a leg out from this stock market. It might be likely to see policies hostile to stock investment enacted should Senator Clinton or Obama come to power after the next election. In fact, we could return to the same type of regulatory morass and high tax policies that caused so many problems in the 1970’s. This would not bode well for the stock market and for industries regulated and re-regulated by a Democratic administration for the first time in a generation. 

Speaking of the coming election, the Iowa Electronic Markets (a kind of presidential futures market) has a good record of anticipating future presidential election winners. It is run by the faculty of the business school at the University of Iowa with bettors wagering real money. The current quote is showing a Democratic victory in 2008, as shown on the Iowa Electronic Markets website; see at <a href="http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/graphs/graph_Pres08_VS.cfm">http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/graphs/graph_Pres08_VS.cfm</a>.

It is possible that the stock market will decline as the presidential election approaches and the market anticipates the probable democratic winner of the election. I think it is important to realize that if we do return after 2008 to the decades ago battered policies of regulation, re-regulation, trade tariffs, or the socialization/government takeover of the healthcare sector – I think the stock market could experience a contraction of price/earnings ratios reflecting those policies. The combination of an increased inflation and the politics of regulation could result in a stagflation last experienced decades ago. Should the next administration be elected on a left leaning platform, but moderate their policies to the political center, we could be spared a bear market in the economy and stocks. A McCain presidency would likely be a positive for stocks.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Stock Market and Economy: A Return to the 1970&apos;s in Form?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2008/01/the_stock_market_and_economy_a.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2008:/articles//1.17</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-18T18:49:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-18T18:57:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article We are entering, in my opinion, a period of economic and stock market turbulence that will affect the pocketbooks of our citizenry going forward. Commentators on financial television have been reluctant until recent days...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Stock Market Strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Economy:%20A%20Return%20to%20the%201970s%20in%20Form.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

We are entering, in my opinion, a period of economic and stock market turbulence that will affect the pocketbooks of our citizenry going forward. Commentators on financial television have been reluctant until recent days to make the analogy of the present period to the awful economic period of the 1970's, which has been my thesis for some time. ]]>
      <![CDATA[As I have been pointing out for many months in my investment blog, at <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/index.html">http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/index.html</A>, the current strength in oil (reaching $100 per barrel), gold (over $850 per ounce), gold stock, oil stock and oil service stocks are mimicking in form the inflation racked 1970's. As well, the dollar is a weak currency now, much like it was in the late 1970's, when the Swiss franc was popularized as a hard money investment. 

In the December 2007 period, unemployment stepped up to 5% and inflation has been rearing its ugly head in recent months. If unemployment continues to rise, I believe that we may find ourselves in a medium level stagflation. The combination of rising prices and a weakening economy is not a good formula for the welfare of consumers, not to
mention the stock market.

The stock market has started out in 2008 on the wrong foot. I will stick my head out to say that the telltale similarities of the current gold, oil, currency markets, and inflation and potentially rising unemployment, to 1970's market behavior leads me to the opinion that the stock market may continue downward or at least linger in a
trading range in the spirit, but probably not the severity of the 1970's. In other words, it is possible we may see a contraction in the price earnings ratio of the market. 

A caveat here is that should the Federal Reserve step in aggressively to lower key rates to counter the housing and banking decline, it would be constructive for the stock market. But as has been said widely, this would put the Fed between a rock and a hard place, as the dollar and inflation levels would likely react badly to a looser monetary
policy. Interest rates would rise in inflation, putting pressure on the stock market.

If it walks like a duck, then there are ways to make money on the 1970's analogy. I have been invested in gold coins and bullion for some time and have seen the value of those investments soar. As well, I own international oil stocks and shares in an oil service company, which have done well. Even the railroads which did well in the late 1970's have been resurging. On the other hand, we have seen bank and mortgage related stocks decline in the last few months, as I anticipated in my blog article, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/08/bad_banks_good_banks_during_a.html#more">Bad Banks, Good Banks during a Credit Crunch: Opportunity Knocks</A>.

Even national politics seem to be swinging back leftward, which, according to the platform of some major democratic candidates for president, would lead to more regulation, less free trade and the redistribution of wealth (an action which would not create any additional national wealth). The stock market might find itself in a bind if
unenlightened 1970's era policies are enacted after the election.

So even though the gold and oil markets have been extremely strong lately, and I have stated in my investment blog that I believed that there may be a <I>temporary</I> cresting of inflation hedges – the long run still appears to bode well for the oil and (especially) the gold sectors. I also anticipate writing a blog entry on the possibility of buying in the future, strong banks that have been depressed in price in sympathy with the weak banks. So stay tuned.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Economy:%20A%20Return%20to%20the%201970s%20in%20Form.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article<img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Hillary Clinton Stock Market and Economy: Three Areas to Consider</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/12/the_hillary_clinton_stock_mark.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.16</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-09T21:55:55Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-11T20:54:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article Sometimes it takes a full generation to pass before the memories of important historical events are purged from the collective mindset of a society. For example, soon the living memories of World War II...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="24" label="Hillary Clinton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Hillary%20Clinton%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Economy%20Three%20Areas%20to%20Consider.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

Sometimes it takes a full generation to pass before the memories of important historical events are purged from the collective mindset of a society. For example, soon the living memories of World War II will fade into history, and will be available only through our media.  ]]>
      <![CDATA[I would like to remind the reader of the last time in our country’s history when taxes, unemployment, and inflation were extraordinarily high: the late 1970’s during the Carter presidency. Inflation was raging and interest rates were in double digits. Many consumers in our economy today do not have vivid memories of that time.

Yet after the 1970’s inflationary spiral was broken, at the expense of a severe recession with extremely high unemployment – we have since enjoyed over twenty years of a fundamentally good stock market and economy. 

But what if today’s relatively good stock market and jobs creating economy were to change? I must admit, I am of the opinion that the winds of inflation may be building a momentum again after all these years of disinflation. I agree with Alan Greenspan’s opinion in a CNBC interview that we no longer have the luxury of implementing easy monetary policy, as we did after the technology and stock price bubble deflated after 2000, when deflation was actually a threat.  

We have an important election in 2008 that may determine the course of the stock market and the economy in a manner not seen since the late 1970’s. Hillary Clinton is the current favorite to win the Democratic nomination – and she is running a liberal, progressive campaign. The Democratic nominee, whoever he or she may be, may win the White House. 

There are three areas to consider with respect to why the stock market could decline into a bear market should the economically liberal platform be enacted.

The first proposal of the Clinton campaign that would be anathema to the stock market is the planned redistribution of wealth. Giuliani, in a CNBC interview, actually called this plan an entitlement program for the middle class. This would be in the form of a tax-the-rich-and-give-the-funds-to-the-middle-class policy. This sounds good in theory, but this action would not create a penny of additional wealth or a single new job in our country. The policy simply takes away from one group to give to another more favored group of people. Such a policy could even lower the amount of wealth in our country, as those businesses that are creating jobs might make less money – especially small businesses that may have to lay off workers because their taxes are higher. The economy, and consequently the stock market, could suffer.

To give an example in industry of a possible redistribution policy, an obvious target of the Clinton campaign has been the almost universally hated oil and gas industry, which the Senator believes makes too much money. In fact, I saw an excerpt of a Clinton speech on TV that the senator wanted to “take that money” and I suppose give it to a more favored group of people or industry. This action would amount to an expropriation of assets and would reduce employment in the oil industry. The stock market could react badly to that. 

I would like to point out that there have been times in the history of the oil and gas industry during which these companies have been in a depression – but they were not bailed out. But even such a hated industry as the oil and gas industry is capable of creative movement. Fortune magazine reports that Royal Dutch Petroleum has been investing heavily for years in scientific research to produce oil from shale in America. Fortune reports that there is a potential production of 300,000 barrels a day – and it would be profitable at $30 per barrel. They further report that Royal Dutch’s technology is supposed to be way ahead of their competitors, with the company holding some 200 patents. 

Royal Dutch seems to think those years of heavy investment in research and development will pay off in the near-term horizon. They would also plan to build the first new refinery in the U.S. in decades. Heavy taxes on this industry could discourage new investments such as the Royal Dutch project. The end result would be more energy dependence.

The second idea of the Clinton campaign that would hurt the stock market and the economy is the re-regulation and regulation for the first time of major industries in our economy. If an unfettered industry is seen as making too much money, then it might be a target for being regulated, which inherently makes the industry less creative, vibrant, profitable and flexible (with concurrent less ability to withstand economic shocks and adapt to changing economic conditions). 

Alan Greenspan, in a speech reported on CNBC, attributed the flexibility of our economy as one reason why we have not had such deep recessions in recent years. While one sector of the economy is under water, other sectors can pick up the slack and prevent a recession from becoming damaging. But, if employees are tied by regulation to industries that are no longer competitive, then the overall economy would be hurt – those workers would not be retrained for the emerging new industries of the future. The economy would be more rigid by definition and we might experience a declining standard of living as older regulated industries would not make it in the global economy and become obsolete. Like it or not, our capitalist economy works best as a self-correcting mechanism, with new industries supplanting the old.

An industry which could suffer a decline in employment and innovation because of regulation is also a target for criticism: the drug and medical devices companies. We all remember Senator Clinton’s early 1990’s health care plan, crafted behind the scenes, which really would have been “government run healthcare.”  The Senator never apologized for that failed attempt at healthcare nationalization, but even now blames her former opposition. The healthcare sector in the stock market at that time fell out of bed while the Clinton plan was being propagated. If nationalized medicine were to become a threat again, that poor action in the stock market could be repeated. So far, the Senator’s “American Health Choices Plan,” as smoothly explained on the Clinton campaign website, seems on the surface pretty innocuous. But it also would be extremely expensive, perhaps tempting Clinton (if she were elected) to revive her previous ill-considered plan.

I believe that there must be a way to insure the uninsured for hospital stays, doctor visits, pharmaceuticals, etc. without uprooting the entire system. I think one question that is not being discussed is whether a Clinton administration would propose to control drug prices. We have had experience with price controls under President Nixon, and it just produced shortages of goods. There could be shortages of essential medicines if price controls on drugs make it less profitable to invest in the research it takes to develop and produce them. A less profitable atmosphere for the drug industry means fewer drug companies and fewer drugs being invented. Why should entrepreneurs launch new drug companies pioneering new science when their prices are to be controlled and profits regulated?

The fact is that the pharmaceutical industry is not the problem – they are the solution. A pharmaceutical company might spend one billion dollars and two decades developing an important drug that can save lives and keep people from costly stays in the hospital. If artificial controls are placed on the drug’s price, then it actually may not be profitable for the company to develop new drugs in the future. They could fire researchers and other employees to cut costs. Since over 90% of all new pharmaceuticals are developed in the US, health care costs would likely go up as new cost saving cures would not be developed.

Drug companies have invented life saving medicines that have kept tens of millions of people out of costly hospital stays, and saved and extended many lives. I believe these drugs are an extremely cost-effective solution to illness and disease – and I do believe all private insurance should cover prescription drugs liberally. 

The third area of a possible Clinton presidency about which one must be concerned if you are a stock market investor or simply a taxpayer, is free trade. An open trade system has allowed our country to prosper in the last two decades. Granted, currency manipulation on the part of a trading partner (such as China) is not free trade – but most of our trading partners and the newly emerging eastern European economies are adopting lower taxes and free market policies. It is a shame that the liberal wing of the Democratic Party has not received that message and is indicating a path for this country that may bring our economy and our stock market back to the past economic policies of the 1970’s.

The outcome of the 2008 presidential election will do much to determine the outlook for the economy and the stock market in the next several years. Regardless of who wins, the second year of the presidential term is usually poor for the stock market, as the policy makers make the economy take its medicine early on in the term. 

The Federal Reserve, in its current easing mode, should encourage the stock market until the months before the election, when it will be clearer who the victor will be. At that time, the stock market’s future direction will be determined by the degree of wisdom of the victor’s economic policies, and, of course, Federal Reserve policy. 

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Hillary%20Clinton%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Economy%20Three%20Areas%20to%20Consider.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Don&apos;t Fight Yesterday&apos;s Investment Battle: Why Betting on Last Year&apos;s Bull Market Always Fails</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/11/dont_fight_yesterdays_investme.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.15</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-06T23:19:34Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:58:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article Just when a new bull market in a category of investments (stocks or commodities, etc.) is percolating to the top, investors may still be immersed in the psychology of investing in the previous bull...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="22" label="investing strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="18" label="investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Dont%20Fight%20Yesterdays%20Investment%20Battle:%20Why%20Betting%20on%20Last%20Years%20Bull%20Market%20Always%20Fails.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

Just when a <I>new</I> bull market in a category of investments (stocks or commodities, etc.) is percolating to the top, investors may still be immersed in the psychology of investing in the <I>previous</I> bull market's most favored investment. As the maturing trend dies out, investors may still try to find reasons to invest in that trend, even though it may be actually reversing, with some investors playing yesterday's game. This may happen just when the long-term trend for the mature trend may have turned down.]]>
      <![CDATA[For example, hypothetically, if the case were true that the recent 2007 stock market squalls signified a coming bear top in the market, many players by definition would not recognize such and would, looking through the rear view mirror, be playing yesterday's game, still investing in the dying bull market. 

These types of long-term reversals do not happen often, but such reversals present opportunities to preserve past bull market profits and to invest in a new bull market's investments. There is a fundamental change in the psychology of the markets when this transition occurs – and it needs to be recognized. But that is easier said than done.

I recall shortly after the great stock market bull of the 1980's launched in 1982-3, many prominent investors were incredulous about the market's powerful launch. After all, the Dow average had hit a peak of slightly over 1000 back in 1966, and was only finally 16 years later in 1982 decisively breaking through that level once again. 

Even back then in the Stone Age, on the popular eighties-era NBC "Family Ties" television series, Alex Keaton, the character played by
Michael J. Fox, exclaimed that 1000 was the new floor for the stock market! I think we all knew how important it was at that time for the stock market to exceed the boundaries that had restricted stock prices for over a decade and a half before 1982.

I think one of the reasons why many people were not more fully invested in the stock market during that exciting time was that they were fighting yesterday's investment battle. Investors were scarred by the brutal collapse of the one-decision Nifty-Fifty stocks in
1973-74. Economic conditions were extremely poor during those years with inflation raging and interest rates soaring. These were the
worst recessionary times since the Great Depression. Investors were in no mood to buy stocks – no return, no sizzle – at that time. 

However, nothing had been more dazzling to the markets in the late 1970's than the spectacular bull market in gold prices that climaxed at about $850 per ounce at the end of the decade. Indeed back in the late seventies up until the launch of the 1980's super-bull market in stocks, gold dominated the minds of investors. Not only were gold prices and shares escalating at that time, but oil and oil service companies were on the march as well. This certainly compares in many ways with events in today's gold and oil markets.

This dramatic 1970's bull trend in gold was my initiation into the financial markets for the financially innocent 20-something I was
then. But I found myself psychologically fighting yesterday's investment battle soon after the stock market took off in 1982. Yes,
I owned stocks, but I was still wondering when gold was going to recover, which by 1982 had collapsed in price to $300 per ounce after
the speculative frenzy in per ounce prices broke.  

Indeed, it is possible that gold prices and the stock market can move in the same direction. When the stock market took off in the early 1980's, the gold market rallied from $300 - $500, and I somehow believed there was still hope for gold. However, as time passed, I realized the promise of equities and held stocks, and over time the psychology and mystique surrounding the gold market faded, that is until now, over twenty years later.

Where are we now in the scenario of transitioning leadership and bull markets? What market will be the most forceful on the upside in the coming few years? Well, the process began when the price of gold, oil, gold shares and oil shares in 2003 began escalating in a manner of building inflationary pressures after Federal Reserve Board monetary ease during the millennium recession. Gold and oil have more than doubled in price, and equities have risen with them in an unseemly liaison.  In fact, they have risen so much (with gold now around $800 per ounce), oil, gold, oil shares, and gold shares may hit <I>temporary</I> resistance near or slightly above this level. See my article, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/10/bulletin_october_24_2007_what.html">Bulletin: October 24, 2007 - What Now on Gold?</A>

However, the last four years of generally rising equity prices may be the limit to what we see in the stock market, as market-leading inflation plays (including traditional commodity inflation plays) hit resistance for now in front of the investment pack. In addition, the likelihood of a left-leaning President being elected next year may keep a lid on the general market. 

That said, we may indeed have a short grace period in the time before the election of rising stock prices due to the very positive effect of recent Federal Reserve Board consecutive discount rate cuts. Growth stocks may do well in the near term, given a temporary cresting in inflation hedges. I believe the long-term inflation genie is in the hands of Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke.

I have written about a building danger of underlying inflation in my article, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/02/inflation_and_the_stock_market.html">Inflation and the Stock Market: Does Anyone Remember the Seventies?</A>  Gold, as an inflation hedge has already doubled in price.  Nonetheless, the bull market in gold may continue for some time given that inflation still seems to be building and given that the 1970's bull market in gold lasted ten years.  Bear in mind that during the inflation of the 1970's there were two waves of increasing prices for gold, punctuated by solid declines in between waves in that measure of prices and in the value of inflation hedges. We may now similarly be in a temporary topping of the first wave now around $850 per ounce. Whether the fever breaks for gold and other hedges and cools for a while remains to be seen. But as they say in Las Vegas, the cards have been dealt.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Dont%20Fight%20Yesterdays%20Investment%20Battle:%20Why%20Betting%20on%20Last%20Years%20Bull%20Market%20Always%20Fails.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Bulletin: October 24, 2007 - What Now on Gold?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/10/bulletin_october_24_2007_what.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.14</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-24T17:28:07Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:56:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article In my article, When Gold Speaks a Thousand Words, published on this website on April 23, 2007, I posited my very positive view on gold. I wrote how that view, held by me for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Bulletin:%20October%2024,%202007%20-%20What%20Now%20on%20Gold.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

In my article, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/04/when_gold_speaks_a_thousand_wo.html">When Gold Speaks a Thousand Words</A>,  published on this website on April 23, 2007, I posited my very positive view on gold. I wrote how that view, held by me for some time, had led me to make several gold coin and bullion purchases in the $300’s and $400’s per ounce in recent years.

Since that time, and especially quite recently, gold has rallied strongly, and has risen past its 2006 high to a present price of approximately $753.99. Oil has also risen in a spectacular fashion into the high $80’s per barrel. These support my conclusion in another article I penned for this website, published on February 26, 2007, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/02/inflation_and_the_stock_market.html">Inflation and the Stock Market: Does Anyone Remember the Seventies?</A>, that the gold price, oil and oil service companies stock price booms we have witnessed for the last few years are quite similar to the booms in like instruments last seen during the late 70’s. However, that boom in the late seventies and early eighties represented a long term peak in oil prices around $40 - per barrel and the gold price around $850. ]]>
      <![CDATA[Gold is now, over 25 years later, and after a brutal long-term bear market, approaching that peak area of $850 per ounce reached previously in 1980. This current powerful leg up in the gold market stimulated just lately by the subprime crisis, the ensuing credit and housing crunch, and what I believe is the underlying inflation in some sectors of the economy means one of three scenarios for gold. 

The first scenario is that the current surge in  gold and oil prices represent an area of peaking action, where after some time of forming a top  (with gold possibly between $800-$850), they will correct for some time and the excitement in these investments will abate. I feel that this scenario is less likely to unfold.  

In the second scenario for gold, the metal will find short-term <I>temporary</I> resistance at the old 1980’s highs and will correct temporarily, perhaps for many months or, while testing that upward resistance level perhaps several times, before breaking through the old top and surging to uncharted territory on the upside, embarking on a new and powerful
leg in the gold bull market.

The third scenario rests on examining the history of the gold price bull market during the entire decade of the seventies, which started after the dollar was no longer redeemable into gold after the monetary crisis of 1971. The gold price rose powerfully into the mid-seventies, only to peak out and go lower, before taking off again into the second inflationary wave of that decade and multiplying many times in price to $850. This scenario, if it happened today, would mean that the gold price, would reach a temporary peak in the coming year or so, then decline into a lull that could last over a year, before beginning another powerful ascent that would dwarf anything we have seen to date.

I feel the odds favor the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> or 3<SUP>rd</SUP> scenario, so I am personally holding onto my gold coin and bullion positions. I feel, as I said in my February 26<SUP>th</SUP>, 2007 article, cited above, that "the
jury has rendered a verdict of 'bull market'."

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Bulletin:%20October%2024,%202007%20-%20What%20Now%20on%20Gold.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Level of Confidence in the Stock Market and Our Social Contract</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/10/the_level_of_confidence_in_the.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.13</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-01T21:05:49Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:54:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article There is unsaid in our daily life a social contract between all the players. Individuals are able to live their daily lives in a manner without much fear because of this contract, unless one...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Stock Market Strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7" label="stock investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20" label="stock market strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Level%20of%20Confidence%20in%20the%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Our%20Social%20Contract.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

There is unsaid in our daily life a social contract between all the players. Individuals are able to live their daily lives in a manner without much fear because of this contract, unless one lives in an area where this contract has broken down. You might call this unseen force in ordinary life the confidence that people have that their persons, social, economic, spiritual lives will be protected from the actions of others in that society, or from their government. We have enacted laws, and have institutional structures to protect us, such as the judicial system and religion, however imperfect they are. We have laws on the books to protect the citizenry. The Ten Commandments states that it is not right, for example, for men or women to kill each other, or to steal, and so on. ]]>
      <![CDATA[The strength of the American society and free economic system shows that persons coming from different cultures can coexist peacefully while having ample opportunity to be upwardly mobile. This faith in our system of government and in our form of capitalism draws immigrants from all over the globe to participate in our democracy. Over the 200 plus years of our country, we have survived recessions, depressions, World Wars, and even a Civil War, when the political consensus was broken – and our democracy has persisted. 

I came of age during the interesting period of the Vietnam War era, where society was divided between the supporters of the war, and many young people, who exited from society by “dropping out” and joining the growing “hippie” counterculture. The confidence that many young people had in their government’s policies and its supporters was strained. In 1966, the stock market had passed 1000; a level which would not be seen again for 16 years afterward. Inflation was beginning to brew from keeping a foreign war going. Government had had a guns and butter policy – in other words, our society was rich enough to support a war and domestic spending – at the cost of the inflation racked 1970’s, when stock returns were quite poor and the Dow fell under 600 in mid decade.  

I was only thirteen and very impressionable when the movie “If”, directed by Lindsay Anderson, starring young Malcolm McDowell, premiered in London in 1968. A friend of the family escorted me to the box office for the movie, rated X in those days in New York City, and we sat down to watch the film, which was the telling of a repressive British private school. I don’t want to spoil the movie for you, (parental guidance strongly advised) but the social contract was broken in the movie between students and their elders – and the results are at the end of the film. Of course, the film is called “If.” The contract, the confidence in their system, could not keep these British schoolboys, at least in the film, from uprooting the institutions with which they were surrounded.  

There is also a definite factor of the influence of confidence in our economic life, and specifically the level of confidence underlying the stock market. Breaks in the market like the ones we have experienced recently stir up fears among investors that their economic life will be impaired – that if you are in the stock market you will lose a lot of money because the stock market is declining: a perceived truism. The break in the market causes a loss in confidence. Of course, one might say the stock market is merely reflecting the health of our domestic economy and the rest of the world’s level of economic activity. So a loss of confidence in the market might reflect an ongoing recession, surging inflation, bank failures or mortgage defaults, etc., or the market drop might be a financial event, where the drop simply feeds on itself (such as the Crash of 1987). 

Fear causes many investors to lose confidence and act in a manner that may be contrary to their economic interest in the market – for example, selling stocks when they are at bargain levels. In that case, the investor loses “confidence” in the market as it falls, and does not believe that it will continue to be a good store of value and continue to appreciate – so he may sell his stocks while feeling fear. I write about the idea of not being led around by one’s emotions when investing in my article,  <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/03/stock_market_investing_and_the.html">Stock Market Investing and the Power of Contrary Opinion</A>.

The exception to the rule of the viability of long term investment in the stock market is in the hands of our elected officials, who if they are not enlightened, may enact policies which cause the economy to fundamentally falter for an extended time, as in the 1930’s and 1970’s – or for the Federal Reserve to miscalculate and cause an ordinary recession to get deeper or to cause the economy to overheat. In my article, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/02/hedge_funds_derivatives_debt_c.html">Hedge Funds, Derivatives, Debt, China, and the Risk of Systemic Market Panic</A>,I write a bit of the systemic risks out there that could cause a economic breakdown in the economy and stock market.  

So just as the social contract holds the bonds of our democracy together and permits its citizens the possibility of living full lives, the level of underlying confidence in our free market system keeps our stock market from a catastrophic breakdown. Only terrible miscalculation by our government officials or by the Federal Reserve serves to threaten this bond.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Level%20of%20Confidence%20in%20the%20Stock%20Market%20and%20Our%20Social%20Contract.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Bad Banks, Good Banks during a Credit Crunch: Opportunity Knocks</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/08/bad_banks_good_banks_during_a.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.12</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-08T18:59:38Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:53:49Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article This article might be titled, How You Can Make a Fortune by Investing in Strong Banks During a Credit Crunch. In my article Monday March 5, 2007: Are Stocks Still Worthwhile Investments? I stated...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Stock Market Strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7" label="stock investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Bad%20Banks,%20Good%20Banks%20during%20a%20Credit%20Crunch:%20Opportunity%20Knocks.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

This article might be titled, <I>How You Can Make a Fortune by Investing in Strong Banks During a Credit Crunch.</I>  In my article <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/03/monday_march_5_2007_are_stocks.html">Monday March 5, 2007: Are Stocks Still Worthwhile Investments?</a> I stated in reference to at that time lesser possibility of contagion in the subprime mortgage problem, <I>"The only thing that I believe could affect the economy and equities would be for the authorities to starve the system of providing mortgage money to potential borrowers – in other words, a credit crunch."</I>]]>
      <![CDATA[This indeed seems to be unfolding, as only the most creditworthy persons are now receiving mortgages. As reported in <I>The Wall Street Journal</I>, one Bear Stearns rep stated that credit conditions are the tightest he has seen in 25 years. And the squeeze seems to be felt throughout the entire credit market, not just in subprime lending. I heard in a CNBC interview with Donald Trump that the Donald believes "cash is king."  It remains to be seen whether the Federal Reserve will come to the rescue to the credit markets by lowering key rates and stating that the Federal Reserve will stand by its historic position as lender of last resort. This would be a huge sigh of relief.

Ken Heebner, a respected mutual fund manager, stated on CNBC that the price of housing on the two coasts could retrace to their levels at the turn of the century. Most people would weather this adjustment as only the most recent borrowers would be affected. I mention this somewhat severe prediction as Ken Heebner has a well deserved reputation for thinking outside the box, and I believe his opinion must be given credence. This of course, would place further downward pressure on banks and mortgage issues.

We are now seeing share prices of mortgage issues decimated, and even shares of strong banks such as Wachovia and Citibank are coming under heavy pressure. It is my opinion that weak banks with high subprime loan exposure could lose more than half to two-thirds of their value from their recent highs. But what may be less expected, the shares of strong banks with little such exposure may also see their shares cut substantially from their recent highs. If one takes the position of investing only in strong banks with less subprime exposure at much lower share levels, I believe you can profit over the coming years. However, it is probably going to take some time before all the bad loans are washed out of the bad banks before one should invest in the good ones. On a positive note, on Monday August 6<SUP>th</SUP>, 2007, many banks exhibited a key reversal, indicating a continuation of the positive share price behavior of that day in the short term.

I base the opinions in the previous paragraph on the share price behaviors of a wide range of banks during the last great banking crisis: the savings and loan/real estate crisis of the late 1980’s-early 1990's. I also stated in March 2007 in my above referenced article, <I>"Many people are pointing to a "debacle" in sub prime mortgage loans as a possible threat to the banking system and to our stock market. You may recall the savings and loan crisis which reverberated through our banking system and stock market in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. This crisis was portrayed by bank failures, plummeting bank share prices, and a real estate collapse. This was enough to cause a general bear market, punctuated by Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait."</I>

During the early 1990’s real estate crisis, bank shares, both good and bad banks saw their shares under severe pressure. Many banks went belly-up, and even Citibank was thought to be a candidate for failure. However, the height of that crisis would have been the ideal time to buy shares of strong banks – as from the early 1990’s until recently they have been outstanding performers. This strategy permitted me to multiply my original investments in Wachovia and Wells Fargo from the 1990’s forward. Lessons can be extrapolated from that time to the present day.

No one can foretell precisely how long this credit crunch will endure, but if we keep our powder dry and keep our eye on strong banks, then the past may indeed be prologue to the future.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Bad%20Banks,%20Good%20Banks%20during%20a%20Credit%20Crunch:%20Opportunity%20Knocks.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Getting Back to Basics with Your Investments</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/07/getting_back_to_basics_with_yo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.11</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-19T20:11:09Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:52:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We have had many sharp and fearful declines in the market, which I have pointed out in some of my other articles – and there will be more in the future but my book helps explain how to weather these storms.</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9" label="investing advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="18" label="investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Getting%20Back%20to%20Basics%20with%20Your%20Investments.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

It would be all to easy for me to espouse various stock market investment theories – when to be successful in investing, I argue that one should stay the course of longer term investment as described in my book, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/stock-investment-advice.html">A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks</A>. Sure, we have had many sharp and fearful declines in the market, which I have pointed out in some of my other articles – and there will be more in the future.]]>
      <![CDATA[However, sharp market declines should usually not cause one to sell long held mutual funds or carefully chosen equities. I must admit at times my confidence has been shaken. For example, prior to the decline beginning on February 27, 2007, I had begun a program of diversifying some of my assets out of stocks (I had been almost 100% invested in equities for some time). When the market broke, I quickly concluded this program of diversifying so that I sold near the price I had intended. In
retrospect, concluding this program at the time of the market break was not the optimal course of action, but I call it as much a lesson as an insurance premium to achieve the diversification I wanted.  We can only go with our best knowledge and with the odds in our favor. 

We can increase our knowledge of how to invest profitably by reading books on the subject of the stock market written by the best investors out there. Books by Peter Lynch and John Neff are favorites of mine. By imitating the investing behavior of the best investors, I believe we can greatly
increase our odds for success and be reassured to a certain extent that we can get through difficult markets.

In my book, <A HREF="http://www.reiznersway.com/stock-investment-advice.html">A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks</A>, sold on my website, I present a method of investing that is easy to understand and that most anyone can apply. Further I have found that the method is capable of producing sizeable gains in a portfolio of stocks and equity funds over time. Over the time I have been using the method I describe in the book, my invested assets have grown very well. 

In many of the mutual funds in which I have invested I have multiplied my original investment. I chose most of my funds in the manner described in my book, by doing some very basic, but I believe very profound research. This research begins with perusing the mutual fund rankings as presented periodically in Forbes magazine. I discuss the necessary further research elsewhere on my website and in my book.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Getting%20Back%20to%20Basics%20with%20Your%20Investments.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Be Conservative in the Stock Market - Make More $$$</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/06/be_conservative_in_the_stock_m.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.10</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-12T00:20:18Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:48:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article In my eBook, A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks, I outline my investing journey through both good and awful stock markets, and tell how I am to the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Stock Market Strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7" label="stock investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20" label="stock market strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Be%20Conservative%20in%20the%20Stock%20Market%20-%20Make%20More%20$$$.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

In my eBook, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/stock-investment-advice.html">A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks</a>, I outline my investing journey through both good and awful stock markets, and tell how I am to the current date winning the battle for long term profits in equities and mutual funds. The eBook profiles my unique technique for profitably investing in stocks and mutual funds. Much of my results have been achieved and profits retained by choosing stocks and funds more conservatively.]]>
      <![CDATA[Decades ago, during the “educational” phase of my investing career, I wanted my profits in the most wealth destructive manner possible - rapidly. I avoided sound mutual funds which might have much earlier in my career started my wealth-building process. This tendency led me to invest in the volatile technology stocks of the time, many of which later fell out of favor.  Many of those stocks in which I put my money 30 years ago, just like the ones many others recently invested in the dot com, “get rich-quick” technology period of the 1995-1999, will never see their old highs again. New bull markets usually have leaders different than the previous bull, so the techs of any previous buoyant market period may not be around or may be insignificant 5 or 10 years in the future. A diversified portfolio of well-chosen stocks, in this case, will get you a lot further than buying all the hot stocks of the day. 

In the 1980’s, I noticed and began my research in the 1990’s into how     following selected stock buying behaviors of the best investors,  money managers, and company officers can lead to excellent results. This is the basic tenet I learned after years of experience with the same research materials, as well as observation and investing in the market: one is better choosing equities that are being bought by at least one of the smartest money managers around and the officers running the company as defined in my eBook.  It takes time, sometimes lots of time, and patience to make money in the stock market. This often leads to investment in blue chips which may be experiencing temporary difficulties. My highly profitable investment in Wells Fargo in the early 1990's is an example of such a strategy conforming to the principles of my eBook profiled in the chapter entitled “Multiples of My Investment.” My investment in Johnson and Johnson also in the early 1990's as described in my eBook, against a stark background for pharmaceuticals, provided profits of many times my investment. These are major companies. The market will never fail over time to provide you with opportunities for stock investment. 
	
For many investors in the meantime, investing in well managed more conservative, stock mutual funds can provide a solid foundation for future wealth and retirement. I have tested this technique with my own money: choosing the more conservative value mutual funds rather than the hot faddish ones of the day. To date most of those I chose for myself, given a 10-15 year period invested, multiplied my original investment several times over. To tell you what could go wrong, I have an acquaintance who once told me before the 2000-2003 bear market, that he had put his money in a mutual fund which had gone up 200% in each of the preceding two years. This particular fund’s money manager was known for an aggressive trading style and had been often profiled in the media. When the late 1990's market fever broke, the fund shares collapsed and there were redemptions. It became one of the worst performing funds. It seems that this story is repeated in some form in every market cycle. When I later saw my acquaintance I asked him how he was doing, he answered by stating flatly that he was not in the market anymore. The moral: look for funds, preferably value types whose managers are looking for equities selling at bargain prices, where performance gains are just fine through good markets and losses smaller in market dips. There are excellent managers out there who can accomplish a substantial growth of your invested capital over time. Look in my <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/stock-investment-advice.html">eBook</a> for more specifics on both investing in individual stocks and mutual funds.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/Be%20Conservative%20in%20the%20Stock%20Market%20-%20Make%20More%20$$$.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Best Way I Know to Build Stock Market Wealth: Well Chosen Mutual Funds</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/05/the_best_way_i_know_to_build_s.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.9</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-08T22:52:25Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-22T19:47:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article In my eBook, A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks, I share my philosophy and practice of selecting mutual funds managed by value managers in order to build wealth...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7" label="stock investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20" label="stock market strategies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Best%20Way%20I%20Know%20to%20Build%20Stock%20Market%20Wealth%20Well%20Chosen%20Mutual%20Funds.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

In my eBook, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/stock-investment-advice.html">A Way to Wealth – The Art of Investing in Common Stocks</a>, I share my philosophy and practice of selecting mutual funds managed by value managers in order to build wealth over time. Most of the funds in which I have personally chosen to invest fit that category. So far, my original investments in most of the funds in which I have invested have multiplied over the years and I have by and large been satisfied with their performance in both up and down markets. My funds have included the Templeton Growth Fund, First Eagle Global Fund, and the Royce Opportunity Fund (sold).

I think the investor before purchasing a fund should look at the track record of his prospective choices, preferably over at least one full market cycle (bull and bear market performance). Look for funds which perform well in down markets as well as bull markets. You will be grateful you did if these funds are again able to sustain comparable performance when there is a bear market. I discuss this in my ebook as well as in the <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/investment-advice-faqs.html">FAQs</a> of my website.]]>
      <![CDATA[Some value fund managers may look at publicly traded companies and attempt to calculate a private market value for the firm, and then buy them at a discount to that share price in the open market. When the stock market marks up the price of the company stock to their previously established private market value, they may sell the stock for a profit. 

This method may lend itself to value managers loading up on companies when the general market is relatively lower, at “bargain” prices, and unloading shares as the market moves upward and stocks become more “expensive.”

Other value managers may look at price-earnings ratio ranges over time, an important measure of value. Sometimes downtrodden companies or industry segments will linger for months or even years at low price earnings ratios, before beginning spectacular advances. 

The example of homebuilders gives some insight into how value fund managers may select stocks for investment. Many of them lingered at single digit price-earnings ratios at the turn of the century before turning upward. Since the bull market that began in late 2002, these stocks became favorites, even “growth stocks”, while still maintaining their low P/E’s (their earnings grew as well as their price during these years). 

 It is no secret that the builders have experienced a bit of a debacle recently as some have lost more than half of their share value during 2006 (D.R. Horton and Hovanian Enterprises, for example) as the real estate market weakened. We will see if and when these equities will revive. 

Opinion is currently divided among the value investors I follow regarding homebuilders, with Bill Miller (Legg Mason) and John Neff (retired fund manager) apparently still looking favorably on selected builders. 

As this instance shows, often value investors are early in the game. The equities they choose may not appear on growth managers’ radar screen until they are out of the “bargain” stage and have been growing their earnings for a while. I believe value stocks are frequently less volatile than many of their growth brethren. Thus the well-constructed value mutual fund may surrender less of its value back in down markets, and may provide upside gains in good markets. 

My experience is that value fund investment is an important component of an investment program that is designed to build wealth over time. Funds provide diversification over many holdings, an added advantage designed to reduce the risks of investment concentration. There may be little reason why a well-chosen fund cannot be held for the long term as part of a long term investment plan.

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/The%20Best%20Way%20I%20Know%20to%20Build%20Stock%20Market%20Wealth%20Well%20Chosen%20Mutual%20Funds.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>When Gold Speaks a Thousand Words</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/04/when_gold_speaks_a_thousand_wo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.reiznersway.com,2007:/articles//1.8</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-23T23:53:26Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-23T18:41:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Downloadable PDF version of this article In the last three and a half decades we have encountered both periods of relative stability in the price of gold, but also periods of extreme volatility. When President Nixon took the United States...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Stock Market Advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7" label="stock investment advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="stock market advice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/When%20Gold%20Speaks%20a%20Thousand%20Words.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>

In the last three and a half decades we have encountered both periods of relative stability in the price of gold, but also periods of extreme volatility. When President Nixon took the United States off the gold standard in 1971, the result was a 9 year bull market in the price of the golden metal. There were two inflationary waves in the 1970’s, the first peaking in 1974-5, and the second more severe wave peaking in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. This period was also marked by escalating oil prices, driven by the actions of an Arabian cartel. Eventually, the gold price rose from its fixed price of $35 to its peak of almost $700 per ounce (London pm fix) in 1980.

]]>
      <![CDATA[We are now encountering, after 27 years of a gold bear market, a revival of both oil and gold prices similar to that of the 1970’s. Gold is in the $600 plus range after years of languishing below $400 per ounce. Just as occurred in the 1970’s, we have recently seen gold, oil and oil service shares increase tremendously in value. We are seeing some months of consumer price inflation beyond what I believe is a comfortable range. Farm land and food price inflation is with us as well. There has been a well-documented inflation in the price of commodities, which some have attributed to the extra demand from India and China. I think this latter point is a good thing in that it shows the expansion of capitalism or, in the case of China, communism with a capitalist face, which should increase world trade and act as a damper on some excess inflation. 

On March 21, 2007 the Federal Reserve chose to leave interest rates unchanged and appeared to back away from future rate increases, while at the same time recognizing potentially inflationary pressures. Whether the Fed will reverse its trend since mid 2004 of raising rates and actually lower them shortly remains to be seen. It is entirely possible that we could experience inflationary pressures even if the economy slows down. The undesired effect of this event would likely be a return of inflationary expectations among the American citizenry, something that has not really happened for over two decades. That is not in the memory of many players in the markets, and thus could occur while not being fully recognized as such. I write about this sort of psychological condition in my article, <a href="http://www.reiznersway.com/articles/2007/02/inflation_and_the_stock_market.html">Inflation and the Stock Market: Does Anyone Remember the Seventies?</a>

It is interesting to consider from a technical point of view (though I am no chartist) just why the gold price started to accelerate after 2002. Gold is after all, a commodity, and the price of commodities can be known to turn on a dime. Sometimes it pays to keep this analysis on the simpler side. If one draws a simple trend line on a monthly gold chart across the top of the gold price in 1980 through the top in the mid 1990’s, one would find that the gold price broke that downtrend line on the upside in 2002 when gold traded past approximately $300. As I was late to this market, I bought the physical metal myself four times: one time in the mid $300’s, twice around $400, and once again in the mid $400’s. I realized upon looking at this monthly chart, that we were talking about a longer term swing upward in the gold price. A breakout of this magnitude is much more significant than one on a daily or even a weekly chart. Well, enough about charts and technical analysis. In my opinion, the only time charts are readable in relative isolation is when one considers commodities.

The gold price is an indication of inflation in our economy. It has even trended upward at times even when our dollar has risen against other currencies. I believe the jury has rendered a verdict of “bull market.”

<a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('http://www.reiznersway.com/pdfs/When%20Gold%20Speaks%20a%20Thousand%20Words.pdf','windowname','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=350,height=400')">Downloadable PDF version of this article <img src="http://www.reiznersway.com/images/icon-pdf.gif"></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
